Published by the 50/50 by 2030 Foundation, University of Canberra

Research and Stories through a Gendered Lens

The future of #MeToo: On danger and pleasure

Mar 28, 2018 | News

Written by Joanna Richards

The #MeToo movement represents a significant shift in the zeitgeist for women and for women’s sexuality. Despite much speculation that it would be short-lived, its prominence and dominance over the current culture conversation continues. As such, it is necessary to question the movement’s continuing political goals, and whether the outcomes actually have the desired effect.

We must talk about the sexual threat and violence omnipresent in the lives of women, but we also need to create spaces for discussions about pleasure

The silence broken by the victims of sexual assault and harassment was a powerful call to action for many women and men alike. However, to continue to center the conversation around women’s victimhood may trigger reactionary conservative policies which seek to control and protect, rather than empower women. This presents significant challenges as it requires a balanced approach; we must talk about the sexual threat and violence omnipresent in the lives of women, but it is also imperative that we create spaces for discussions about pleasure.

For many, it is strange to think about #MeToo through the lens of sexuality outside of sexual assault or harassment. This is due to the endurance of the patriarchal understanding that sex is something that is done to women, not an act in which they are also a participant. The fact that women’s sexuality is at the very core of the #MeToo discussion, makes the conversation politically difficult to manoeuvre.

pleasure danger

To date, sexual assault has mainly been discussed in terms of the harmful effects it may have on other parts of women’s lives, such as jobs, or more broadly the ability to succeed in a male-dominated world. The conversation has steered away from talking about these issues purely in relation to sex, as this would necessitate a move away from traditional scripts, to one where women are active participants in sexual activity.

Carole Vance has proposed the Pleasure and Danger framework as an alternative way of exploring female sexuality. She suggests that for women, sex is not only a domain of exploration, pleasure and agency, but also one of danger, repression, and restriction. This tension is central to women’s lives and in discussions surrounding their sexuality. To focus only on pleasure risks ignoring the structures within which women live. In contrast, to focus only on the danger ignores women’s sexual agency and unwittingly increases the sexual terror and despair.

Framing women as weak or damaged impacts the ways in which women are allowed to discuss their experiences

Sexual danger and fear also often influence the way in which women’s sexual experiences are presented in the media, resulting in a repetition of narratives of women as passive victims. By framing women as weak or damaged, it renews the legitimacy of patriarchally motivated discourses of control and protection. This in turn impacts the ways in which they are allowed to discuss their experiences, and consequently, circumscribes any attempts to create alternative or nuanced articulations of sexual experiences.

The #MeToo movement represents a major success for feminist forces that have long fought to platform female voices and experiences. The longer it lasts, the better for women all around the world. That said, the movement must be allowed to be complicated and flexible. Women need a space to break their silence about assault and harassment, without tacitly and unwittingly conscribing unhelpful retellings of myths about women’s sexuality.

shutterstock 1005751645

The #MeToo movement represents a major success for feminist forces

Despite decades of work by the women’s movement to normalise female sexual pleasure, the topic still continues to be a taboo. To wait until all risk and danger is eradicated from sexuality is to give up on women having access to the sexual arena. By postponing conversations about pleasure we end up signaling fear, thus giving power away to the oppressor.

Shifting the focus to women’s sexual pleasure does not erase or negate the quest for social justice and equity, nor does it claim to be the answer to ending all oppression

However, shifting the focus to women’s sexual pleasure does not erase or negate the quest for social justice and equity, nor does it claim to be the answer to ending all oppression or weaken the critique of sexual danger. Discussions about sexual fulfillment, just like discussions about sexual harm, can be used to demand the creation of safer spaces, to demand new modes of relating across gender, where violation is not always already inscribed in the body.

Highlighted article

Other highlighted articles

The suffocating blanket of heteronormativity

The suffocating blanket of heteronormativity

Look around you. Men and women couple up on TV shows like Love Island for millions of viewers. The latest Hello Fresh ad shows Mum cooking dinner for her husband and two children. You see a friend’s baby and coo “oh, he’ll break a lot of girls’ hearts when he’s...

Why women are breaking up with the news

Why women are breaking up with the news

Despite huge and seemingly compelling news events –  the Black Summer bushfires, the global pandemic and a hard-fought election campaign interest in news continues to fall. The proportion of those who say they have a high interest in news has dropped, with interest...

The capitalisation and secrecy of the menstrual industry

The capitalisation and secrecy of the menstrual industry

Cash Flow: The Businesses of Menstruation, by UK-based academic Dr Camilla Mørk Røstvik, delves into how much we know about the menstrual industry - its surprisingly patriarchal business model, how it has amplified menstrual taboos and adapted to change. BroadAgenda...

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This