Published by the 50/50 by 2030 Foundation, University of Canberra

news & views powered by research

From global to regional: Meeting the SDGs in the Pacific region

by | Nov 5, 2018 | The Agenda

Recently, the 2018 Pacific SDG Progress Wheels were launched. They reveal the Pacific progress on the Sustainable Development Goals (SGDs). As the United Nations explains, the goals are interconnected – often the key to success on one will involve tackling issues more commonly associated with another.

The Progress Wheel provides a snapshot of the country and region progress and the current state of available data for each of the SGD targets and indicators for those selected as the most important to the Pacific region – the Pacific Sustainable Development indicators. 

The dispersed nature of the Pacific region and the limited availability of resources make it hard to sustain momentum

The report reveals that while some progress is being made, much work remains to be done by the 2030 deadline.  Of critical importance, progress against many goals could not be measured due to a lack of methodology or lack of data. In addition, the dispersed nature of the Pacific region and the limited availability of resources make it hard to sustain momentum.

 

womens participation

Scores: 0 no achievement against the goal; 1 minimal achievement; 2 some progress; 3 average progress; 4 good progress. Generated from data available here.

One of the measurable goals – women’s participation in leadership and decision-making 2016 – 2018 illustrates the clear differences among the Pacific countries. However, goals such as ending discrimination against women and girls, access to reproductive health and rights and ending violence against women remain immeasurable in many countries due to insufficient data or lacking research methodologies. 

The United Nations acknowledges that reaching the goals ‘cannot be done alone’ and the involvement of civil society is required. Yet, the activities led by civil society are often sidelined by state based regional meetings, and always under-resourced. 

Emerging grassroots actors and sites if included in their full diversity could help collectively reach the goals. This is evidenced by my research which focuses on the activities of bottom-up Pacific women’s alliances who are advocating for an end to gender inequality in the region. 

shutterstock 694728724

The state view on meeting gender equality – The Pacific Regionalism Framework 

The formal or state based view of Pacific regionalism is found in the Framework for Pacific Regionalism. The Framework mentions both gender equality, and equality for all:

 

We embrace good governance, full observance of democratic values, the rule of law, defence and promotion of human rights, gender equality and commitment to just societies. We support full inclusivity, equity & equality for all people of the Pacific.

 

Moving away from its earlier origins as a largely trade and security focused agenda, current Pacific regional strategies and resources are slowly including gender equality as a strategy. The Secretary General of the Pacific Islands Forum noted this shift to inclusivity:

 

Pacific Regionalism has to be inclusive so that there is access to the breadth of experience and insight that exists in our people. It has to be inclusive to make sure that it impacts on those in our communities who are most in need. It has to be inclusive because only by looking at the whole picture can we identify where we might make the most profound impact.

 

To bring a greater gender focus for the region, the Pacific Leaders Gender Equality Declaration. (PLGED) emerged from the Pacific Leaders Forum in 2012. PLGED commitments include increasing the representation of women in legislatures and decision making; economic empowerment of  women; improving health and education outcomes; and eradication of sexual and gender-based violence.

The Pacific Women Shaping Pacific Development program committed $320m over 10 years to aid the implementation of these commitments. However, the PLGED Trend Report shows that progress has been slow.

shutterstock 333763826 

Who is included / excluded

The Framework for Pacific Regionalism promises to set the groundwork for all people in the Pacific to ‘walk together’. 

However there is an absence of recognition of the diversity or intersectionality of Pacific women in the documents surrounding the formal agenda. There also remains an insufficient inclusion of women in all their diversity at the table of regional decision-making sites.

There is an absence of recognition of the diversity or intersectionality of Pacific women

My interviews with Pacific activists reveal this is especially the case for women of diverse sexual orientation or gender identity. To date, if formal regional documents list gender equality as a priority at all, mentions in official documents have been limited to the binary of men and women. Marginalised Pacific women specificities such as transgender recognition is not included in outcome statements of Pacific Islands Leaders meetings.

Acknowledging and resourcing diverse regional grassroots actors to have a say in the agenda led by regional institutions is the key to making progress 

shutterstock 561184588 

Meeting gender equality – The view from grassroots agents of change

The real agents of change in Pacific regionalism activity mobilising for this progress are the grassroots actors forming alliances and coalitions to maximise their limited resources, amplify their voices and push for greater inclusion and gender equality change in the Pacific. In response to civil society agitation, Pacific leaders have recognised the need for a new inclusive and game changing approach to Pacific regionalism:

 

…spur us to re-think the form that Pacific regionalism needs to take in order to address our complex contemporary challenges, including poverty, non-communicable diseases, social inequities, gender issues and our unique vulnerabilities and dependencies… At the heart of this new approach is an emphasis on inclusive and robust policy development and implementation…It has to be inclusive to make sure that it impacts on those in our communities who are most in need. It has to be inclusive because only by looking at the whole picture can we identify where we might make the most profound impact.

 

There is political opportunity for civil society in this new approach in the formal sphere. In response to regional institutions, Pacific feminist civil society will keep advocating for its rights to shape the agenda and engage in the dialogue.

It is crucial that these grassroots efforts are also measured and data collected and included in the Progress Wheels. Working together, state and non-state actors can develop the necessary methodology, leaving no-one behind as per the SDG mantra.

Screen Shot 2018 11 05 at 10.06.46 pm

 

Jane Alver is a PhD Candidate at the University of Canberra. This blog is part of an ongoing research project on Pacific civil society alliances, supervised by Selen Ercan, John Dryzek and Jensen Sass at the Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance.  

Highlighted article

Other highlighted articles

Imposter syndrome isn’t real, but I call mine ‘Beryl’

Imposter syndrome isn’t real, but I call mine ‘Beryl’

I hate to fail. My failure avoidance leads to a tendency for overwork. I drive myself harder than any manager will, mostly out of fear of failure rather than love for the work. My feelings of insecurity make me a good employee and student, but they also put me at risk...

Cathy Freeman, Jemma Mi Mi and the delusion of inclusion

Cathy Freeman, Jemma Mi Mi and the delusion of inclusion

Kuku Yalanji woman Cathy Freeman was the most prominent person in recent media coverage of the 20th anniversary of the Sydney Olympics. She was acclaimed for unifying the nation in 2000 by lighting the cauldron at the opening ceremony winning a gold medal in the 400...

How investing in the care sector can save the economy

How investing in the care sector can save the economy

Pandemics affect men and women differently. COVID-19 has magnified our existing, entrenched and systemic inequalities, disproportionately impacting those in part-time and casual work (largely women), those who work in hospitality and retail (largely women) and those...

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This